Quantcast
Channel: Is there anything wrong with this more symmetric aircraft design, and why isn't it used? - Aviation Stack Exchange
Browsing latest articles
Browse All 5 View Live

Answer by Zeus for Is there anything wrong with this more symmetric aircraft...

Just to add a very basic consideration to the already good answers here.While there may be minor advantages of having the vertical tail symmetry, there is no actual symmetry in the vertical plane for...

View Article



Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Answer by aeroalias for Is there anything wrong with this more symmetric...

You're right that there aren't any production aircraft with a 'symmetric' design. But quite a few experimental aircraft have them, especially the tail sitter VTOL ones- note that even they aren't...

View Article

Answer by Peter Kämpf for Is there anything wrong with this more symmetric...

You are right, a symmetric layout would reduce flight mechanical complications like rudder movements causing a rolling moment on top of the intended yawing moment. But would it be worth it? Airplanes...

View Article

Answer by Airsick for Is there anything wrong with this more symmetric...

The biggest single problem with this is the location of the main spar - across the middle of the fuselage. This might not be a problem for single seat military or sports aircraft but would be a major...

View Article

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Is there anything wrong with this more symmetric aircraft design, and why...

I imagine a fixed wing airplane design that's a lot more symmetric than what I see today. This symmetric design has wings in the middle of the fuselage (neither high wing nor low wing), and the...

View Article

Browsing latest articles
Browse All 5 View Live




Latest Images